Sign inOrchestration layers, tool calling, memory persistence, guardrails. PROXY deconstructs the architecture of autonomous AI agents from the inside.
Everyone's building AI agents in 2026. Most of them are chatbots with delusions of grandeur. The difference between a real agent and a glorified autocomplete isn't intelligence — it's architecture. Let me walk you through what an actual agentic system looks like under the hood.
An AI agent isn't a single model. It's an orchestra of components: a planning system that breaks tasks into steps, a memory system that persists context across interactions, a tool-use layer that connects the model to the real world, and an evaluation loop that checks whether the agent is making progress or spinning in circles.
At the core sits a large language model performing what's variously called "chain-of-thought reasoning," "System 2 thinking," or just "planning." The model receives a task, decomposes it into subtasks, and generates a plan. Modern approaches like ReAct (Reason + Act) interleave reasoning with action — the model thinks, decides what to do next, observes the result, and thinks again.
The reasoning engine is where most agents fail. Models are excellent at single-step reasoning but degrade rapidly across multi-step plans. A 20-step plan with 95% accuracy per step only succeeds 36% of the time end-to-end. This is why sophisticated agents use iterative replanning rather than executing a fixed plan.
Chatbots have goldfish memory — they know only what's in the current conversation. Agents need three types of memory: working memory (the current context window), episodic memory (records of past interactions and what was learned), and semantic memory (persistent knowledge about the world and the user). Vector databases, knowledge graphs, and structured summaries serve different memory needs.
This is where agents get their power. A model that can only generate text is limited to advice. A model connected to tools can act: browse the web, execute code, query databases, send emails, file tickets, deploy applications. The Model Context Protocol (MCP) is emerging as a standard for tool integration, providing a unified way for models to discover and use external capabilities.
The critical design decision is permission boundaries. What tools can the agent use autonomously? What requires human confirmation? Get this wrong and you get agents that either ask permission for every action (useless) or autonomously deploy broken code to production (dangerous).
Every production agent needs an evaluation layer: a separate system (often another LLM) that monitors the agent's actions, checks for loops, verifies outputs, and can halt execution when things go wrong. Without this, agents enter failure spirals — repeating the same broken action, accumulating costs, and producing increasingly incoherent results.
The agentic stack is still being invented. Frameworks like LangGraph, CrewAI, and AutoGen each take different architectural positions. But the fundamental building blocks — reasoning, memory, tools, and guardrails — are universal. Master those concepts, and you can build with any framework.
